Burma orders NLD to stop political activities

Note: Home Affairs of Burma sends the following letter to Aung San Suu Kyi and NLD party to inform the party to halt political activities and notes "What’s more, it may lead to more difficulties in national reconsolidation."

Source: http://www.myanmar.com/newspaper/nlm/index.html

Home Affairs Ministry sends letter to U Aung Shwe, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi informing they are to act in accord with lawNAY PYI TAW, 28 June-The Ministry of Home Affairs today sent a letter to U Aung Shwe and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, informing that they are to act in accord with the law.
The letter states that National League for Democracy was permitted to be registered as a party on 27 September 1988 in accordance with Political Parties Registration Law; that the Union Election Commission issued Notification No.18/2010 dated 9 April 2010 announcing that the existing parties, if they wish to remain as political parties, may apply to the commission within 60 days in line with Political Parties Registration Law Section-25 (State Peace and Development Council Law No.2/2010) issued on 8 March 2010; that however, the NLD did not apply for continued existence of a political party and registration; that so, the NLD became null and void according to the law; and that the commission issued Notification No.97/2010 dated 14 September 2010 announcing that the NLD was dissolved together with four other parties by revoking the permit for continued existence of political parties and registration.
In connection with the case, the NLD lodged an appeal to Supreme Court (Yangon) on 5 November 2010 that according to the 2010 Judicial Law Section-5 (a), (h) & (j) and the 1877 Specific Relief Act Section-45 & 55, the dissolution of the party was not legitimate. But the appeal was turned down by Supreme Court (Nay Pyi Taw) on 22 November, 2010.
It is also mentioned in the letter that despite being dissolved as a political party, the NLD is found to have kept opening its party headquarters and branches in states and regions and other towns, erecting the signboards and hoisting flags at some offices, issuing statements, publishing periodicals and videos, meeting with other organizations and holding meetings and ceremonies.
Such acts are not only against the law but also tantamount to opposing the hluttaws at various levels formed with representatives elected in accord with the constitution approved by the entire national people in order to build a peaceful, modern and disciplineflourishing democratic nation and the government elected by those hluttaws.
What’s more, it may lead to more difficulties in national reconsolidation.
If they really want to accept and practise democracy effectively, they are to stop such acts that can harm peace and stability and the rule of law as well as the unity among the people including monks and service personnel.
For U Aung Shwe and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, they should form a social organization if they want to engage in social affairs in team or group. If so, they have to apply to the Ministry of Home Affairs in accordance with the procedures and the ministry will take measures in accord with the law.
Authorities concerned trying to expose three suspects who plotted to blast bombs in Zabuthiri Township of Nay Pyi Taw and Chanayethazan and PyinOoLwin townships of Mandalay Region
NAY PYI TAW, 28 June-The June 25 issues of daily newspapers have carried the news that explosions occurred in Zabuthiri Township of Nay Pyi Taw and Chanayethazan and PyinOoLwin townships of Mandalay Region on 24 June morning, destroying two houses and a car and injuring three people.
Thanks to the investigation of authorities concerned in cooperation with duty-conscious people, it is learnt that the explosion that occurred in a house in Nay Pyi Taw is owned by Daw Than Myint of Maha Aungmyay Township in Mandalay; and that it was rented by Sai Hsam and Sai Aik for six months for K 650,000 per month on 24 April. Another explosion that occurred in a house in PyinOoLwin is of Daw Saw Sandar Paing and it was also rented by the same persons for six months for K 140,000 per month on 5 May.
According to investigation into the car blast in Mansdalay, it is learnt that three men bought a Surf with number plate 3B/1904 (without license) through brokers Hashin and Kyaw Kyaw Htet on 21 June; that one man carried a packet of money; and that the buyers went in that car and stayed at Pacific Hotel in Mandalay for a night on 23 June. According to further investigation, it is also learnt that the man who carried the packet of money is Sai Kyaw Myint Oo, an elder brother of Sai Moe Hein, 19, of U Aik Sai of Tainlon Village, Muse Township, working at Ninja Motorbike Parts Shop of Ahwai (a) Sai Hla Aung on 83 Street between 35th and 36th Streets in Maha Aungmyay Township; that Hashin and Kyaw Kyaw Htet confirmed that the car buyers were Sai Kyaw Myint Oo, Sai Hsam and Sai Aik when he was shown the photos from Sai Moe Hein.
Sai Kyaw Myint Oo, Sai Hsam and Sai Aik rented houses and bought a cheap car without license with intent to blast bombs in Nay Pyi Taw, Mandalay and PyinOoLwin simultaneously. To do so, they spent K 4.74 million on house rentals and K 6 million on the car totalling over ten million kyats. With the aim of causing deaths and panic among the public, they left and blasted the car in front of crowded Mandalay Zaycho Market apartment.
Following are the identifications of the three suspects:
(a) Sai Hsam: Aged 25, 5' 5" in height, fair complexion, a scar by the left eye.
(b) Sai Aik: Aged 25, 5' 3" in height, short hair, fair complexion, freckles on the cheeks
(c) Sai Kyaw Myint Oo:Aged 25, 5' 4" in height, shoulder-length hair, broad forehead, straight nose, fair complexion, strong accent Authorities concerned are trying their best to arrest those three at large. Like the previous similar incidents in which the culprits were captured thanks to the duty-conscious people, the people are urged to inform authorities concerned if they discover any suspicious-looking persons.

Singapore: MFA Spokesman's Comments

This is reaction from MFA of Singapore on 22 April, 2011 on the border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia in the morning on the same day.


MFA SPOKESMAN'S COMMENTS


In response to media queries on the border clashes
between Cambodia and Thailand today, the MFA spokesman said:


“We are deeply concerned by the clashes, and call on both
countries to exercise restraint. We urge Cambodia and Thailand to
resolve their differences through negotiations. Singapore supports
the efforts by Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa who has
been in touch with his Cambodian and Thai counterparts after the
clashes today. Indonesia, as ASEAN Chair, has been actively
facilitating dialogue between the two countries to resolve their
differences peacefully. This is important for the long term
relationship of Cambodia and Thailand, as well as in the broader
interests of ASEAN.”

. . . . .


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
SINGAPORE
22 APRIL 2011

Dr. Surin Pitsuwan, Asean Sec-Gen, press statement on Thailand-Cambodia

Press Statement of Dr Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of Asean, calling for a peaceful resolution between Thailand and Cambodia

"No Alternative to Genuine Border Talks" --Surin

"The world and ASEAN have been alarmed by the new outbreak of violent and fatal clashes along the Cambodian-Thai border. The appeal for restraint and a quick return to the negotiatiing table will become louder from the ASEAN and Dialogue Partners. I can only add my voice to that call for a peaceful solution to a long simmering tension between our two ASEAN Member States. There is really no other alternative to a genuine dialogue between the two sides, " said Dr. Surin Pitsuwan, Secretary-General of ASEAN.

Dr. Surin Pitsuwan has worked hard behind the scene to support Indonesia, the current Chair of ASEAN, to convene the unprecedented February 22 meeting in Jakarta of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers devoted specifically to the bilateral border conflicts between the two ASEAN neighbors, Cambodia and Thailand.

"We thought we had responded effectively to the call of the UN Security Council's of February 14 with our own ASEAN's approach to the problem of our two member states," said Dr. Surin, who is a former Foreign Minister of Thailand.

"The renewed fighting not only disappointed the other ASEAN Member States, we have also failed the world in its expectation of all of us."

"Not only tens of thousands of people on both sides of the border having to suffer the consequences of displacement and evacuation away from the on-going violence, we also risk the judgment of the global community that its faith and confidence in us have been misplaced. That will, unfortunately, have a very negative impact on our region as a whole, " Dr. Surin lamented.

Statement of MFA of Thailand on the clash at the Thai-Cambodia border on 24 April 2011

Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Thailand regarding the unprovoked armed attacks by Cambodian troops at the Thai-Cambodia border on 24 April 2011
April 24, 2011, 10:27 pm

With regard to the repeated unprovoked armed attacks on 24 April 2011 by Cambodian troops on Thai soldiers and civilians, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand wishes to state the following:

1. From 03.00 – 03.10 hrs., the Thai Military Patrol Unit detected a group of Cambodian troops advancing into the area of Ta Kwai Temple and Ta Muen Temples close to the Thai front line in Surin Province. Without warning, the Cambodian troops opened fire with small arms prompting the Thai troops to return fire with rifles.

2. At 09.45 hrs., the Cambodian troops again opened fire into the area of Ta Muen Temples in the Thai territory, this time using heavy weapons, including mortars, artilleries, and tank cannons. The Thai troops responded initially with small arms and later were forced to react proportionately with mortars and artilleries, while the Cambodian troops continued to fire at the Thai troops along the Thai defensive line.

3. At 11.45 hrs., the Cambodian troops tried to invade the Thai territory by mobilizing its troops into the Ta Muen Temples supported by firing heavy weapons, with an aim to seize and take control over the Ta Muen Temples. The Thai troops repulsed the advance of the Cambodian troops. The exchange of fires stopped at 12.45 hrs.

4. At 15.25 hrs., the Cambodian troops resumed firing repeatedly using heavy weapons including mortars and artilleries into the area of Ta Muen Temples. The Thai troops responded by firing mortars and the Cambodian troops started firing artilleries at the Thai side. The exchange of fires continued until 17.00 hrs.

5. Since 22 April 2011, the Cambodian troops have moved two battalions of troops from a military base at Phra Viharn Temple into the area near Ta Muen Temples. It has been further reported on 24 April 2011 that the Cambodian military at all levels were instructed to completely reject any direct contact or talk with the Thai counterpart.

6. The Ministry steadfastly maintains that the Thai side has never opened fire first and has always exercised utmost restraint. Nevertheless, the Cambodian acts of aggression left Thailand with no choice but to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity by using proportionate means with necessity, under international law, and strictly directed at only military targets.

7. Thailand, once again, protests in the strongest terms the repeated unprovoked armed attacks of Cambodia which are in clear violation of international law and Charter of United Nations. Thailand, therefore, strongly condemns all the aforementioned Cambodia’s acts of aggression, and calls on the Cambodian side to resolve disputes through peaceful dialogue under existing bilateral mechanisms.

8. Thailand has instructed all of its diplomatic missions to inform their host governments.

http://www.mfa.go.th/web/35.php?id=27152

TPBS interview with His Holiness the Dalai Lama

This is the first clip of an exclusive interview by the ThaiPBS with His Holiness Dalai Lama the 14th.

I had this interview on the 14th March, in Dharamsala, India, where His Holiness lives-in-exile since 1961. In the morning of the same day, a group of 105 Thai people, arranged by "Semsikkha", have a special occassion to host this annual lesson by His Holiness.

During the greetings to the Thai group, His Holiness began by saying that Thai Buddhism and Tibetan Buddhism are very similar in many ways, so I began the very first question by asking him to explain in more details how to introduce Buddhism to solve political conflicts especially in Thailand.

My first encounter with His Holiness the Dalai Lama

What a great moment which I have for an exclusive interview with His Holiness the Dalai Lama, for the ThaiPBS. It was a precious moment to be kept in my memories forever !!!

I cannot exaggerate the feelings, but up until this moment, I am still thrilled just thinking of "the" moment. To be sitting in front of His Holiness and ask him questions about the future of Tibet, his decision to devolve from politics, and his "professional laughter", his reincarnation and so on and so forth...is so memorable for me, as a journalist and an admirer of his work and his missions.

Forty minutes were not quite enough, but considered myself lucky, I tried to make it to the full, in my first encounter with His Holiness the Dalai Lama. (Keeping fingers crossed, I secretly hope that there will be a second or third)

His Holiness just announced his decision to step down from politics on 10th March, I met him on 14th March and I asked him again his decision. He is so determined and not having any second thoughts in answering the question. He modestly admits that "for selfish reasons, I want to step down and to concentrate only on spiritual role for Tibetans".

For me, it is very compassionate of him to be very honest in saying that his decision is "selfish". He adds that after working for Tibetans for more than 60 years, it is now time to release his responsibility in politics to laypeople of Tibetans. Of course, some Tibetans I met in Dharamsala were disheartened with his announcement, but they also are determined to build the future in their hands too.

Given that he has been the centre of Tibetans for 6 decades, who can blame them for feeling disheartened?

What else do I ask him and what his answers are...please follow the exclusive interview on "This is TVThai" programme and from my blog both in Thai and English and Facebook.

Exclusive interview with Vice President of ICC Hans-Peter Kaul

Recently, the name of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has come into attention of the Thai public when Robert Amsterdam, international lawyer hired by Mr.Thaksin Shinawatra, advocates for filing the Thai government on the charge of “crime against humanities” through the institution. I asked, Hans Peter Kaul, Vice President of the ICC the procedure of the investigation and whether it is possible.

Q: The red shirt protestors said they’d like the ICC to investigate the death of 90 people from the riot in April and May last year, what is the possibility, can ICC involve in this investigation?
A: I have of course been informed about this news, I have also been told that it is American professor or American lawyer, Robert Amsterdam who was advising certain people in the country to take this out…this is nonsense, why is it nonsense, because he must know that as long as Thailand is not a state party to the court, the court can never intervene to the domestic policy of the country. I am grateful that I can clarify this important message as there are so many people in this country who do not understand the system of the treaty, so the public opinion should not be misled by false prophet who are directing public opinion in the direction which is irrelevant and which cannot work.

Q: The only factor that can bring ICC to this case is Thailand has to ratify in the “Rome Statute” first, am I right?
A: Yes, again, ICC has jurisdiction over crime committed in Thailand only after the ICC ratification, so we cannot look back into events occurred in the past and, of course, this is also another important point. Not every political violence amounts to genocide or crime against humanities and it cannot be war crimes even if human rights violation might have been committed. If the type of crime does not correspond to this treaty, it is of course no jurisdiction, because we are not responsible for ordinary killings, we are not responsible for police violence or this type of normal crime. We are the most competent for the most serious crime concern to the International Community. See, it is on a different scale, they are mass crimes and more serious than ordinary crimes.

Q: With the death toll of 90 people and it happened in Thailand, don’t you consider it as massive killings?
A: I cannot comment on this because this will end up immediately as taking position on domestic policy matters. Judges of the ICC cannot matter into internal affairs of state so well let me repeat what I said before, ICC can be of relevance to Thailand and can benefit the Thai society if the government and Thai people join the International Criminal Court.


Q: Just in the case, “Red shirts” want to file petition again in this case, will it be possible?
A: As I said ICC for the time being, have no relevance to Thailand and I would like to make clear that we know, yes, in various countries there are always forces who want to use ICC as an instrument against their political opponents. ICC cannot be instrumentalised in the conflict of domestic policies; we are a non-political nature and objective institution, so we must avoid to be drawn into a political conflict between two parties in the domestic disputes.

Q: Even though Robert Amsterdam, the lawyer…
A: I do not give any importance to him, no importance should be given to him by Thai people to what he is saying and the way he is proposing because it does not work, he is misleading the Thai people.

Q: Even though he has tried to put on international pressure on the Thai government to do so? Would it be possible?
A: There are many people in the world who try all kinds of maneuvers; ICC has nothing to do with this. As I said and I repeat for the third time, ICC can be of relevance to Thailand only if Thai people and the Thai government make a sovereign decision to become a member of the ICC. ICC cannot play any role in the struggle between two factions of the Thai domestic policy scene; we do not want because we are a judicial neutral and objective body. So many political disputes in the world and each time, if we would be silly enough, it would be crazy enough to meddle in this political disputes, it would be very harmful in our standing and our reputation in the world.

Q: What is the stance of Thailand on signing the “Rome Statute”?
A: Well, the possibility is Thailand has signed Rome Statute already in 2000 and to sign a treaty means normally the state has the intention to ratify and what is required is someone’s decision by Thailand to join a treaty or not. It is a positive thing that such a treaty, such a statute is not imposed on a nation. It is sovereign and voluntary decision of people of the government and of the people concern. We sincerely have the hope that such a country like Thailand which is so resourceful with so many talented people and committed to the rule of law and committed to human rights can join ICC.

Q: What would be the positive aspect of ratification to the Rome Statute?
A: The positive aspect is Thailand will strengthen the protection of human rights both on international and national level and let us compare with adoption of a new law protecting human rights of a population of a country, then the parliament of Thailand adopt a new law enhancing and promoting human rights of Thailand. So people of Thailand do not get more money, but more secure and have a better guarantee so they can live out the fear of injustice and human rights violation.